Comments on Air Toxics Benchmarks Review
DEQ invites the public to comment on the Air Toxics Benchmark Review rulemaking from Friday, July 14 to Monday, Oct. 2, 2017. Comments received outside of this period will not be considered. Maintained by the State of Oregon.
| Namelegal entity | Stateaddress | Emailwebsite | Commentadditional data | Additional Documentwebsite |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oregonians for Fair Air Regulations | Oregon | tom.wood@stoel.com | Please see the attached letter from Thomas R. Wood | https://data.oregon.gov/views/dv6h-8bqc/files/aa53 |
| NiPERA, Inc. | NC | mtaylor@nipera.org | Please see attached comments. | https://data.oregon.gov/views/dv6h-8bqc/files/74c4 |
| Am Forest & Paper Asscn + Am Wood Council | Washington DC | thunt@awc.org | Change proposed ABC based on chromium data provide | https://data.oregon.gov/views/dv6h-8bqc/files/7563 |
Vendor Environmental Stance Screening
A supply chain compliance team evaluating a potential vendor checks whether the company submitted public comments opposing or supporting stricter air toxics limits, using that position as a signal of environmental compliance culture before onboarding.
B2B Sales Prospecting for Environmental Consulting Firms
A sales team at an environmental consulting firm identifies businesses that engaged with Oregon air toxics rulemaking as warm prospects for compliance advisory services, since active participation signals regulatory exposure and budget for outside counsel.
Counterparty Regulatory Risk Profiling
An underwriter assessing a commercial insurance application for an Oregon-based industrial firm checks whether the company formally opposed air toxics benchmark tightening, which may indicate anticipated compliance costs or ongoing regulatory friction relevant to liability pricing.



















